Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Yersinia aleksiciae whole-genome short-read sequencing via Illumina Genome Analyzer II with 299.9 million reads and 47.9 billion bases at solid quality (98.7% Q20, 94.2% Q30). The 47.8% GC reflects a gram-negative bacterium's typical composition. Despite the older sequencing platform, this dataset's good base quality supports reference genome assembly and comparative genomics within the Yersinia genus.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0