Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
73/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Leptidea juvernica (wood white butterfly) whole-genome sequencing via Illumina HiSeq 2000 with 5.38 billion reads and extraordinary 1.26 trillion bases at good quality (92.8% Q20, 87.7% Q30). The 35.8% GC reflects lepidopteran genomic composition and AT-richness. This ultra-deep dataset enables de novo assembly, structural variant discovery, and population genomics in this endangered butterfly species.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0