← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
71/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Mus musculus
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
71 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
8083550887
reported
total reads
13508846
reported
n content pct
0.133
measured
pct q20 bases
91.7
measured
pct q30 bases
81.3
measured
gc content pct
53.5
measured
mean read length
296.9
measured
mean base quality
33.7
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
94.82
measured
mean target coverage
149.7
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 71/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
81.3
measured
×1
56%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
12 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0