← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
86/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Escherichia coli
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer II
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
2,094 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1027594110011
reported
total reads
7673320639
reported
mean coverage
223390
extrapolated
n content pct
0.003
measured
pct q20 bases
96.7
measured
pct q30 bases
89.8
measured
gc content pct
48.5
measured
mean read length
75
measured
mean base quality
37.9
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
35.01
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 86/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
223390
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
89.8
measured
×1
99%
duplication rate pct
35.01
measured
×0.5
16%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
18 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0