← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
52/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer II
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
84 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
54415681864
reported
total reads
263441225
reported
mean coverage
4534.6
extrapolated
n content pct
2.9
measured
pct q20 bases
58.5
measured
pct q30 bases
51.7
measured
gc content pct
37.8
measured
mean read length
108
measured
mean base quality
21.9
measured
adapter content pct
0.77
measured
duplication rate pct
58.75
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 52/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
4534.6
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
51.7
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
58.75
measured
×0.5
0%
adapter content pct
0.77
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
27 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0