← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WES
Organism
Arabidopsis thaliana
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
231 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
916513932138
reported
total reads
1651299163
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
100
measured
pct q30 bases
100
measured
gc content pct
38.4
measured
mean read length
3128.2
measured
mean base quality
93
measured
adapter content pct
22.1
measured
duplication rate pct
5.01
measured
mean target coverage
339449.6
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 87/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean target coverage
339449.6
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
100
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
5.01
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
22.1
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
17 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0