Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Klebsiella pneumoniae (nosocomial pathogen) whole-genome sequencing via Illumina HiSeq 2500 with 11.6 million reads and 3.49 billion bases at high quality (98.2% Q20, 94.5% Q30). The elevated GC at 57.4% reflects K. pneumoniae's genomic bias. This dataset supports clinical strain typing, antibiotic resistance profiling, and comparative analysis of virulence determinants in this opportunistic bacterium.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0