PRJEB23508

BioProject first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

91/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Human targeted amplicon with good base calling (Q30 87.3%, adapter 0%) and expected high duplication (98.0%) but Q30 slightly below optimal thresholds; adequate for population-level genotyping and allele frequency studies, though borderline for rare-variant discovery.

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

76 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 5127013936 reported

total reads 8524263 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 94.6 measured

pct q30 bases 87.3 measured

gc content pct 51.4 measured

mean read length 300.7 measured

mean base quality 35 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 97.99 measured

mean target coverage 82.7 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 91/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 87.3 measured ×1 87%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 3 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0