← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
metadata only · no data-level QC for this typeStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Bos taurus
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer II
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
25 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
57779804391
reported
total reads
430250382
reported
mean coverage
21.4
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
21.4
extrapolated
×1.2
61%
QC cost
34 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently