Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
46/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bos indicus (zebu cattle) whole-genome short-read sequencing via Illumina Genome Analyzer II with 447.6 million reads and 55 billion bases at lower quality (89.3% Q20, 61.9% Q30). The 48.2% GC and elevated N-content (0.066%) reflect an older instrument and probable older sample quality. Users should apply strict quality filtering; this dataset may detect common variants but struggles with rare, heterozygous sites in population studies.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0