← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
uncultured eukaryote
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
179 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
10745876621
reported
total reads
23252585
reported
n content pct
0.007
measured
pct q20 bases
95.1
measured
pct q30 bases
88.9
measured
gc content pct
44.4
measured
mean read length
230.7
measured
mean base quality
35.4
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
98.11
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 96/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
88.9
measured
×1
95%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
14 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0