Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Uncultured eukaryote amplicon sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 28.7 million reads and 14 billion bases at high quality (97.7% Q20, 93.8% Q30). The 44.5% GC reflects protistan or fungal marker sequences. The large read volume and sample count (289 files) enable sensitive detection of rare eukaryotic taxa in environmental samples. Consider phylogenetic placement and potential host-specificity when interpreting community patterns.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0