← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
36/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
uncultured eukaryote
Instrument
454 GS FLX Titanium
Platform
LS454
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
35 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
120233154
reported
total reads
328505
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
90.4
measured
pct q30 bases
70.7
measured
gc content pct
44.3
measured
mean read length
367.8
measured
mean base quality
32.9
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
93.01
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 36/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
70.7
measured
×1
4%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
1 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0