Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
74/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (opportunistic pathogen) whole-genome pooled-clone sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 12.4 million reads and 5.96 billion bases at excellent quality (98.3% Q20, 96.9% Q30). The elevated GC (64.3%) is characteristic of this gram-negative bacterium. The pooled approach may complicate variant phasing; users should verify whether individual clones can be resolved for clinical surveillance or antimicrobial resistance tracking.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0