Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Uncultured eukaryote amplicon sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 7.7 million reads and 3.45 billion bases at good quality (94% Q20, 90.8% Q30). The 47.4% GC and taxonomically ambiguous source suggest marker-gene profiling (18S, ITS, or CO1) of environmental eukaryotes. Users should clarify the amplicon target and sample source to assess relevance to their ecological or biomonitoring questions.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0