Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Escherichia coli str. K-12 substr. MG1655 (laboratory reference strain) whole-genome sequencing via Illumina HiSeq 4000 with 28.7 million reads and 8.63 billion bases at high quality (97.9% Q20, 94.5% Q30). The 51.7% GC and 0.021% N-content are acceptable. This resequencing of a canonical model organism enables variant discovery, structural variation mapping, and benchmarking of genome assembly algorithms.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0