Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human gut metagenome whole-genome short-read sequencing via Illumina HiSeq 2000 with 1.18 billion reads and 231.7 billion bases at outstanding quality (99% Q20, 94.4% Q30). The 49.4% GC and zero N-content indicate excellent sample and library preparation. This high-quality deep-sequenced dataset enables MAG recovery, strain-resolution genomics, and functional gene discovery in human microbiota.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0