← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
75/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
mouse gut metagenome
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
144 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
331707758724
reported
total reads
1098370062
reported
n content pct
0.003
measured
pct q20 bases
98.3
measured
pct q30 bases
95.2
measured
gc content pct
50.4
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
39.3
measured
adapter content pct
13.79
measured
duplication rate pct
14.81
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 75/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
95.2
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
14.81
measured
×0.5
79%
adapter content pct
13.79
measured
×0.4
9%
QC cost
32 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0