Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens whole-exome sequencing via Illumina HiSeq 4000 with 425.8 million reads, 128.5 billion bases, and exceptional quality (97.4% Q20, 93% Q30, zero N-content). The high coverage depth and consistency suit both rare-variant discovery and robust genotyping in disease cohorts. This dataset is well-powered for detecting heterozygous variants and can support copy-number variation calling if properly processed.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0