← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
5,358 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
2640725593159
reported
total reads
20396456304
reported
n content pct
0.797
measured
pct q20 bases
96.2
measured
pct q30 bases
95.4
measured
gc content pct
40
measured
mean read length
75.8
measured
mean base quality
34.6
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
4.21
measured
mean target coverage
42592.3
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
95.4
measured
×1
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
20 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0