Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Amplicon sequencing from unspecified organism via Illumina MiSeq with 2.7 million reads (920 million bases) spanning 74 files at high quality (97.5% Q20, 96.6% Q30). The 55% GC and high per-sample read depth suggest well-executed targeted profiling. Without knowing the amplicon target and biological source, assess whether this dataset matches your organism and marker-gene of interest before reuse.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0