Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
86/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mus musculus bulk RNA-seq via Illumina HiSeq 4000 with 222.6 million reads and 66.8 billion bases at solid quality (96.7% Q20, 91.8% Q30). The 47% GC and 0.007% N-content indicate clean library. The substantial read depth suits sensitive expression profiling and isoform quantification across mouse tissues or genotypes in developmental or disease contexts.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0