← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
bacterium
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
118 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
4119801784
reported
total reads
9511233
reported
n content pct
0.044
measured
pct q20 bases
99.4
measured
pct q30 bases
97.9
measured
gc content pct
51.2
measured
mean read length
254.7
measured
mean base quality
39
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
97.19
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
97.9
measured
×1
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
11 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0