Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2000 whole-exome sequencing dataset from Homo sapiens uses targeted capture to enrich protein-coding regions, yielding 91.6 million reads and 27.2 billion bases with high quality (96.2% Q20, 93.7% Q30). The 41.4% GC is consistent with exonic sequences; the depth enables sensitive variant discovery across the coding genome for disease-association and clinical-genomics applications. Researchers should verify the exome capture kit and any regional filtration, as off-target capture efficiency varies across platforms.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0