PRJEB29049

BioProject first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

38/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Mus musculus

Instrument

NextSeq 500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1,015 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 71144539740 reported

total reads 958310865 reported

n content pct 0.007 measured

pct q20 bases 80.1 measured

pct q30 bases 73.1 measured

gc content pct 39.1 measured

mean read length 74.7 measured

mean base quality 30.1 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 58.65 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 38/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 73.1 measured ×1 16%

mean base quality 30.1 measured ×0.6 35%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 58.65 measured ×0.4 36%

QC cost 20 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0