← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
60/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1240536074
reported
total reads
3082716
reported
n content pct
0.002
measured
pct q20 bases
92.7
measured
pct q30 bases
83.6
measured
gc content pct
42.3
measured
mean read length
197.9
measured
mean base quality
34
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
36.02
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 60/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
83.6
measured
×1
68%
duplication rate pct
36.02
measured
×0.5
12%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
25 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0