← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Bacillus subtilis
Instrument
GridION
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
26 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
546434816441
reported
total reads
313681472
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
16.7
measured
pct q30 bases
0
measured
gc content pct
44.6
measured
mean read length
2701.6
measured
mean base quality
12.1
measured
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
duplication rate pct
0.53
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 47/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
0
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
0.53
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
16 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0