Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
79/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Yersinia pestis (plague agent) whole-genome sequencing via Illumina HiSeq 4000 with 1.14 billion reads and 118.2 billion bases at exceptional quality (99.3% Q20, 98% Q30). The 55.9% GC and excellent base chemistry enable accurate SNP discovery and phylogeographic resolution. This high-quality pathogen dataset supports evolutionary studies, antibiotic resistance mapping, and forensic identification of natural and anthropogenic foci.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0