Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human lung metagenome amplicon sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 10.5 million reads and 3.25 billion bases at excellent quality (98.8% Q20, 97.8% Q30). The 52.8% GC and 336-file structure suggest large-scale community profiling (16S or similar marker). This dataset is well-suited for mapping respiratory microbiota composition and studying associations with lung disease phenotypes.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0