Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human lung metagenome long-read sequencing via Oxford Nanopore MinION with 3 million reads, 8.13 billion bases, and intrinsically lower accuracy (55.4% Q20, 34.2% Q30) typical of nanopore chemistry. The 56.7% GC and long-read format enable reconstruction of genomic structural variants and strain-level resolution in respiratory microbiota. Users should employ error-correction strategies and hybrid approaches if high-accuracy consensus is needed.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0