Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
48/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Vitis vinifera (grapevine) amplicon sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 9.1 million reads and 5.1 billion bases at moderate quality (89.1% Q20, 84.4% Q30). The 41.8% GC and 95 files suggest targeted profiling, possibly of microbiota or genetic markers in wine production. Users should verify the amplicon identity and whether this dataset suits viticulture, fermentation, or plant-microbe interaction studies.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0