Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens whole-genome sequencing via HiSeq X Ten with 4.39 billion reads and 329.8 billion bases at high coverage (106.4x, extrapolated) and outstanding quality (99.6% Q20, 99.5% Q30). The 0.001% N-content and minimum errors reflect modern high-throughput sequencing standards. This reference-quality human genome dataset enables sensitive rare-variant discovery and comprehensive structural variant mapping for clinical genomics.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0