Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (lactic-acid bacterium) whole-genome sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 2.8 million reads and 1.41 billion bases at excellent quality (96.5% Q20, 94.8% Q30). The 43.9% GC reflects gram-positive composition. This fermentation microbe dataset supports strain characterization, probiotic validation, and comparative analysis of beneficial lactic bacteria in food and health applications.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0