Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina MiSeq whole-genome sequencing dataset from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum provides 1.6 million reads and 804 million bases with excellent quality (96.3% Q20, 94.5% Q30), supporting draft or complete genome assembly of this probiotic lactic-acid bacterium. The 43.7% GC is characteristic; the depth is adequate for detecting plasmids carrying bacteriocin or adhesion genes relevant to probiotic function. Researchers can confidently proceed with assembly and pan-genome comparisons for strain characterization and safety assessment.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0