Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
93/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2000 whole-genome sequencing dataset from Arabidopsis thaliana comprises 4.2 billion reads and 1.19 trillion bases at an exceptional 8,840× mean coverage, providing ultra-deep resequencing for rare-variant detection and structural-variant discovery. The exceptional depth enables fine-mapping of quantitative trait loci and de novo mutation validation in mutant screens. Researchers should note that such extreme coverage far exceeds typical population-genomics needs (20–50×) and may indicate specialized applications requiring variant-detection sensitivity.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0