Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
91/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Gut metagenome amplicon sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 35.4 million reads and 21.3 billion bases at moderate quality (93.5% Q20, 87.4% Q30). The 53.3% GC and 1,149 files suggest large-scale human microbiota sampling across many individuals or time points. This deep dataset enables robust diversity analyses and discovery of compositional signatures associated with disease or treatment.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0