PRJEB31858

BioProject first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

86/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

uncultured eukaryote

Instrument

454 GS FLX

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

12 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 40304054 reported

total reads 172548 reported

n content pct 0.107 measured

pct q20 bases 95.3 measured

pct q30 bases 85.9 measured

gc content pct 51.6 measured

mean read length 231.4 measured

mean base quality 36.4 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 95.21 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 86/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 85.9 measured ×1 80%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 1 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0