Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
64/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Salmo salar (Atlantic salmon) amplicon sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 14.8 million reads and 8.68 billion bases at moderate quality (89.6% Q20, 79.2% Q30). The 53% GC and 118 files suggest multi-sample targeted profiling, possibly microbiota or population genetics markers. Users should clarify the amplicon target and fish developmental stage to determine relevance for aquaculture or disease studies.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0