← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
91/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Instrument
NextSeq 500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
8 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
3754927070
reported
total reads
13523006
reported
n content pct
0.006
measured
pct q20 bases
93.8
measured
pct q30 bases
88
measured
gc content pct
38.6
measured
mean read length
138.6
measured
mean base quality
33.4
measured
adapter content pct
2.09
measured
duplication rate pct
10.32
measured
mean target coverage
15645.5
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 91/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
88
measured
×1
90%
adapter content pct
2.09
measured
×0.5
92%
QC cost
24 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0