Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
40/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2500 whole-genome sequencing dataset from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 provides 33.3 million reads and 16.7 billion bases with good quality (82.7% Q20, 75.3% Q30), enabling virulence and antibiotic-resistance characterization in this model nosocomial pathogen. The 58.2% GC is typical; the moderate depth supports detecting insertion sequences, phage elements, and resistance-associated mutations. This dataset is valuable for understanding clinical-isolate divergence from reference genomes and studying quorum-sensing and biofilm regulation.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0