Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina MiSeq whole-genome sequencing dataset from Listeria monocytogenes comprises 134 million reads and 31.7 billion bases with excellent quality (98.1% Q20, 94.2% Q30), enabling high-confidence variant calling and strain typing for this foodborne pathogen. The 38.2% GC is typical for Listeria; the depth supports virulence-factor mapping and phylogenetic studies for outbreak epidemiology and infection-control applications. The dataset is well-suited for clinical isolate genomics and antimicrobial-resistance surveillance.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0