Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mouse gut metagenome amplicon sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 14.7 million reads and 7.38 billion bases at good quality (95% Q20, 92% Q30). The 55% GC and substantial depth suit microbial community profiling of laboratory-mouse models. Users should verify whether samples are from specific strains or genetic backgrounds to assess comparability with their own mouse microbiota studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0