PRJEB34245
BioProjectProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Assembly-scale WGS of Gallus gallus. Nominal grade A, 100/100, but evidence_strength=0.61 with extrapolated coverage (1621x) requires critical evaluation. Perfect measured metrics (Q30 93%, duplication 7.7%) and extraordinary extrapolated depth suggest exceptional datasets, yet low evidence strength means this assessment is provisional and should be independently verified before de novo assembly commitment.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0