Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mus musculus amplicon sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 1.3 million reads and 327.2 million bases at exceptional quality (98.9% Q20, 98% Q30). The 54.2% GC and 56 files indicate modest multi-sample design. Users should verify the amplicon target; if targeted genetic loci, this dataset suits genotyping studies; if marker-gene, depth per sample may be limiting for rare-OTU detection.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0