Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina MiSeq amplicon dataset from human metagenome samples comprises 8.6 million short reads spanning 4.3 billion bases with moderate quality (76.4% Q20, 65.7% Q30), enabling targeted microbial community profiling at species/operational taxonomic unit resolution. The 56.4% GC content and read-count depth support diversity assessment and taxonomic binning in gut or environmental microbiota. Reusers should verify the specific amplicon target (marker gene) and confirm read-length adequacy for discriminating closely related taxa, as quality metrics suggest acceptable but not exceptional fidelity for rare-variant calling.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0