PRJEB35292

BioProject first seen 2022

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Ovis aries

Instrument

NextSeq 500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

32 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 216182212196 reported

total reads 1446720654 reported

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 97.8 measured

pct q30 bases 96.9 measured

gc content pct 50 measured

mean read length 74.8 measured

mean base quality 35 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 29.04 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96.9 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 35 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 29.04 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 18 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0