PRJEB36436

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

64/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

NextSeq 500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

195 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1241060517584 reported

total reads 4342171157 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 85.2 measured

pct q30 bases 77.6 measured

gc content pct 50.4 measured

mean read length 143.1 measured

mean base quality 31.3 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 71.55 measured

mean target coverage 20017.1 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 64/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean target coverage 20017.1 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 77.6 measured ×1 38%

duplication rate pct 71.55 measured ×0.5 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 16 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0