Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
89/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Metagenome amplicon sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 5.6 million reads and 3.39 billion bases at good quality (94.4% Q20, 86.6% Q30). The 54% GC and unspecified source limit interpretability. Users should clarify the amplicon target and environmental source before assuming applicability to their study; amplicon-based profiling is inherently biased by primer design and may miss divergent taxa.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0