Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
69/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mouse gut metagenome amplicon sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 8.45 million reads and 4.43 billion bases at moderate quality (90.9% Q20, 80.7% Q30). The elevated GC (57.2%) and 144 files suggest systematic sampling across multiple mice or conditions. Users should assess whether this dataset's quality and depth are suitable for detecting OTU-level differences in gut dysbiosis or intervention studies.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0