PRJEB37731

BioProject first seen 2022

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

90/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

feces metagenome

Instrument

DNBSEQ-G400

Platform

DNBSEQ

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

3,342 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1509003606272 reported

total reads 10736838359 reported

n content pct 0.033 measured

pct q20 bases 95.6 measured

pct q30 bases 87 measured

gc content pct 38.1 measured

mean read length 141.9 measured

mean base quality 34.3 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 3.79 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 90/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 87 measured ×1 85%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 17 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0